National Museum of American History-Washington, D.C.

Where do I even begin to write about the National Museum of American History?  This place is amazing! We drove up to meet friends in Georgetown for lunch (which if you are in the area, you must eat at Filomena Ristorante the food is to die for!) and make it over to the museum.

Caroline Scott Harrison's dress

We only got to see about 1/4 or a 1/3 of the museum. It is so large, and there is so many things to see. I had the biggest smile on my face the entire time I was there. It was like taking a kid into a candy store instead this was taking a mid 20's woman with a B.A. in history to the ultimate American history archive! 

As we walked in the first display was the The Star-Spangled Banner, the flag that inspired the National Anthem. The flag is over 200 years old and is quite a site to see. I wanted to take a picture of it sooooooo bad, but photography is not permitted.  I understand why they can't let pictures to be taken to preserve the flag, but they are nice enough to share pictures on their flickr page. Ok, ok we must move on to some other things now. 

Other things we got to see were the First Ladies dresses, pieces of the White House, debris from the Twin Towers after the 9/11 attacks, a piece of the Berlin Wall plus a few other things. I really wanna spend a full day or two walking around and seeing EVERYTHING! 

If you make it out to D.C. to see the museum plan on spending a few hours. There is so much to see and read, plus they have a pretty nifty gift shop. I plan to go back, hopefully soon while the cherry blossoms are in bloom.

This is my Civil Era type photo.

Admission to the museum is free and they are open 364 days a year (closed on Christmas Day) from 10am-730pm.

Scholar Says He’s Found New Photo of Lincoln at Gettysburg

Abraham Lincoln’s appearance at Gettysburg on Nov. 19, 1863, has been remembered in the roughly 270 ringing words he spoke that day and exactly one undisputed photograph.

But now, a scholar is claiming he has identified another image of Lincoln from that occasion: a tiny, dark-suited speck in a wide shot of the crowd, his head slightly bowed.

Christopher Oakley, a professor of new media at the University of North Carolina, Asheville, made the discovery, which was reported in the October issue of Smithsonian magazine, while working with a group of students on theVirtual Lincoln Project. That project, which includes a detailed digital reconstruction of the Gettysburg ceremony, involved looking at the nine known photographs from that day, as well as the roughly 130 known photographs of Lincoln from other occasions.

It was while looking at a much-scrutinized photograph taken by Alexander Gardner that a familiar face, belonging to a figure standing near a man Mr. Oakley had newly identified as Secretary of State William Seward, leaped out.

“It sank in very quickly,” Mr. Oakley, a former Disney animator, said in a telephone interview. “I jumped back from my desk and did a little historian’s happy dance.”

Mr. Oakley is not the first person to spot Lincoln among the throngs in Gardner’s photograph. In 2007, an amateur historian named John Richter drew headlines, and some vigorous rebuttals, when he announced that a different figure on the left-hand side of the photograph — a stovepipe-hatted man on a horse, with his back turned to the camera — was Lincoln.

But the image examined by Mr. Richter was actually one of two very similar stereoscopic images taken by Gardner that day, which were made simultaneously with two different lenses set about three inches apart, and would result in a kind of 3-D image when combined through a viewfinder. It was while looking at a highly magnified detail from the less damaged left-hand image, only recently scanned by the Library of Congress (and which Mr. Richter had not examined), that Mr. Oakley found further evidence supporting his own claim.

The man on the horse, Mr. Oakley argues, cannot be Lincoln, since the new scan reveals that he is wearing epaulets, which Lincoln would not have worn. And his own positive identification of Lincoln has drawn tentative support from some prominent scholars, including some, like Harold Holzer, the chairman of the Lincoln Bicentennial Foundation, who had previously supported Mr. Richter’s claims.

“It’s like ‘Law and Order,’ ” Mr. Holzer told Smithsonian. “You keep enhancing an image until you see the suspect.”

**This is an article from NY TIMES  I did not write it.**